Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hanna v. Homegoods, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11089
Plaintiff:
Raghida Hanna
Defendant:
Homegoods, Inc. and The TJX Companies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hanna v. Toledo Molding & Die, LLC (TV2)
as 4:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Toledo Molding & Die, LLC and William Arnold
Plaintiff:
Majid Hanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mahan et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2019cv12665
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Stephen Busch and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Harris, Roberta Flowers, Mary Koivupera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hahn v. Kana Hotel Group et al
as 3:2018cv00658
Plaintiff:
Hanna Hahn
Defendant:
Kana Hotel Group, Kana Hotels, Inc., Murfreesboro Hotel Partnership, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Summit, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45090
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Jane Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Valley Fire District, City of Norton, Ohio, Village of Boston Heights, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Interested Party:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hanna v. Woodard et al
as 3:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
Abanoub Paul Hanna
Defendant:
Mark Woodard and CRST Dedicated Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Periysamy v. Hanna et al.
as 4:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
Indira Periysamy
Defendant:
Roy B Hanna and John A Dobrilovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanna v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01475
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Melton Hanna
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
