Cases 31 - 40 of 160
Makoski, et al v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00406
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., RAY HINCH, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Makoski and Susan Maksoki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lasker et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv06314
Plaintiff:
Scott Lasker and Leslie Lasker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04217
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Harer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
German v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
Scott German
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02668
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roy Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hensley v. Einalem LLC (PLR1)
as 3:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Einalem, LLC, d/b/a VapeDaugz, LLC, d/b/a Vape Daugz Premium E-Liquid, Charles Scott and Melanie Scott
Plaintiff:
Hannah E. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01815
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela Smith and Scott Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christen Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allred v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Allred
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demonte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Raymond Demonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
