Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03321
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maynard Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
Deanna Norton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03823
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05372
Plaintiff:
Janis Norton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04886
Plaintiff:
Manuel Norton
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv05605
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Philip Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03580
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruby Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Takoma Regional Hospital et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op46165
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff:
Baptist Womens Health Center, LLC, Lexington Hospital Corporation, Amisub (SFH), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Takoma Regional Hospital et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Baptist Womens Health Center, LLC, Lexington Hospital Corporation, Amisub (SFH), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moody v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Moody
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
