Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse et al v. Nabors et al
as 2:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Erin Patterson, Gabriel Biser, Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse and others
Defendant:
Wayne Nabors, Lisa Duke Crowell, William K. Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rachel v. Duke Energy
as 1:2018cv00841
Plaintiff:
Darrian Rachel
Defendant:
Duke Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rachel v. Duke Energy Corporation
as 1:2018cv00701
Plaintiff:
Darrian Rachel
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossmann v. Duke et al
as 5:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Elaine Duke, L. Eric Patterson, Joseph Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whiteside v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv01106
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Whiteside
Defendant:
Brian Duke, Bausman, Derinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. City of Providence, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ellis
Defendant:
City of Providence, Kentucky , William Dukes, Jr. and Dustin Winsted
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlepage v. Dukes et al
as 4:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffery W. Littlepage
Defendant:
William Dukes, Jr. and City of Providence, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke Bierer et al v. Orwell Village Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv02906
Plaintiff:
Wendy Duke Bierer and Robert C. Duke
Defendant:
Orwell Village Police Department , Village of Orwell , Village of Orwell Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
Clifford Robert White
Defendant:
Henderson County, Henderson County Sheriff Department, Brian Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Overton County et al
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hall
Defendant:
Overton County, John Garrett and Daniel Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
