Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Blackmon v. Lenawee County Health Department et al
as 4:2022cv10364
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blackmon
Defendant:
Lenawee County Health Department, Martha Hall, Blissfield Community Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10322
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, John Doe Officer I and John Does 2-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2022cv10306
Plaintiff:
Ricky Scott
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, WA Foot Memorial Hospital, Azam Basheer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Booth v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv10166
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Heidi Washington and Scott Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Scott v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2021cv12774
Plaintiff:
Kristal Scott
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Detroit Police Department, Bridget Lamar and others
Cassini v. Bridgewater et al
as 2:2021cv12551
Plaintiff:
Suhila Eunice Cassini
Defendant:
Scott Bridgewater and Zeinab Bridgewater
Herrera v. Hodshire et al
as 1:2021cv00880
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Herrera
Defendant:
Scott Hodshire and Adam Burlew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witzke v. Rieck
as 3:2021cv12380
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Witzke and Scott Andrew Witzke [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Jordan Rieck
BRT Holdings, LLC v. Memphis, City of
as 2:2021cv12271
Plaintiff:
BRT Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Memphis, City of, City of Memphis Selection Committee, Donna Janssens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MacArthur #524290 v. Eaton County 56A District Court et al
as 1:2021cv00775
Plaintiff:
Scott MacArthur #524290
Defendant:
Eaton County 56A District Court, Douglas R. Lloyd and Kelli Wriggelsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
