Cases 1 - 10 of 35,687
Boyer v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv03956
Defendant:
Ross Co. CPS, Fairfield Co Sheriffs Office, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Alva R. Boyer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Maney v. Secret Service
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Deborah Maney
Defendant:
Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maney v. Kreulen
as 3:2024cv01132
Defendant:
Doug Kreulen
Plaintiff:
Deborah Maney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison et al v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2024cv12454
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Michael DeRose, Leslie Asman and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Harrison and Raychelle Woolfolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Howse v. Trivette et al
as 3:2024cv01125
Defendant:
Jane Doe, J.L. Belton, Glenn Funk and others
Plaintiff:
Rev. Curley Howse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Firstbank, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01126
Defendant:
Firstbank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby G. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. City of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2024cv01590
Defendant:
Dennis Murphy, John James, Jack Bornfield and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FISHER v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2024cv02662
Defendant:
TOWN OF OAKLAND, TENNESSEE, HARVEY ELLIS and JOE MCDONALD
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Helton et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christian Rock, Giles County, Stetson Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easley v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv01123
Defendant:
Officer Scott Johnson
Plaintiff:
Prince Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
