Cases 91 - 100 of 655
Mathis v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02278
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and M. Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrew Cox v. USA
as 22-3366
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW COX
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parsons v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Respondent:
The United States of America and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Donald Lavigne v. USA
as 22-1303
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Nance v. Grady Perry
as 22-5284
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH NATHANIEL NANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GRADY PERRY, Warden
Ibrihim v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terrion Herman v. USA
as 22-5240
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRION D. HERMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Barnett v. USA, et al
as 22-5233
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT HERALD BARNETT
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID PAUL, Warden
Cassaday v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duncan v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
