Cases 71 - 80 of 295
Spencer v. Erwin et al
as 3:2017cv00081
Petitioner:
Robin R. Spencer
Respondent:
Jim Erwin and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Erwin et al
as 3:2017cv00607
Petitioner:
Robin R. Spencer
Respondent:
Jim Erwin and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayberry v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01276
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott Mayberry
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker and Darren Settles
Defendant:
Terease Gettner and Greg Turpster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stanley Fryar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5843
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY FRYAR
Respondent - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Warden and KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hall v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00451
Petitioner:
Victor G. Hall
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections, GEO Group, Inc., The and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jyronna Parker v. KY Department of Correction
as 17-5398
Petitioner - Appellant:
JYRONNA PARKER
Respondent - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Barnes #160068 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv00265
Petitioner:
Lee A. Barnes #160068
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv10569
Petitioner:
Peter Taylor
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Tommy McGuire v. Julia Jones, et al
as 16-2661
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY MCGUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JULIA JONES, Secretary for the Florida Department of Corrections and STATE OF FLORIDA
Morton v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2016cv14074
Petitioner:
William M. Morton
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan Parole Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
