Cases 101 - 110 of 32,875
Bell v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Daron Darnell Bell
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, Richard Boling, Eric Pacheo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Ford v. Larry Brown, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DANIEL FORD
Defendant:
LARRY BROWN, Emergency Management Section (EMS) and DEREK GOWDY, Sergeant, JFC - Security Threat Group (STG) Coordinator
Nelson Wesley v. Cuyahoga County, OH Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-3376
Plaintiff:
NELSON ROY WESLEY
Defendant:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CLIFFORD PINKNEY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv10724
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel Evans, Robert M. Hayes, Robert Mendham and others
Goins v. O'Donnell
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsom v. Dickson County
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Newsom
Defendant:
Dickson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
