Cases 11 - 20 of 368
King Kevin v. Daviess County Sherriffs Department, et al
as 23-5794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING KEVIN, aka George Kevin Quinn
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT, OWENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY EDWARDS, Officer and others
Ettienne v. Peralta et al
as 3:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Ettienne
Defendant:
Lt. Jason Peralta, Sgt. Adam Treinn, Supt. William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Kevin v. The White Woman Next Door on Hummingbird Loop E.... et al
as 4:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
King Kevin
Defendant:
The White Woman Next Door on Hummingbird Loop E.... and Unknown 911 Caller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hamilton County Jail
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
King Allah James
Defendant:
Jim Hammonds, Deputy Cox, Hamblen County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Cater v. Brian Sanders, et al
as 23-5719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES O. CATER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SANDERS, RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, JASON CLAPTON and others
Brandon King v. Jerry Gonzalez
as 23-5648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON J. KING
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY GONZALEZ
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Cage v. Beard et al
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant:
Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Landis Cage
Moore et al v. Washington et al
as 5:2023cv11506
Plaintiff:
John Moore, II, Nazem Saad, Kenneth Matlock and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Mark King, Adrian Dirschell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
