Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Beene v. Perry et al
as 1:2015cv01291
Plaintiff:
Craig Lamont Beene
Defendant:
Grady Perry and Liason Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. TDOC et al
as 1:2015cv01267
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joe Taylor, II
Defendant:
TDOC, Darnell Peterson, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Wilson v. Janis Peterson, et al
as 15-3896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE E. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANIS PETERSON, JAMES POMPUTIUS and CARYN TAYLOR
Lawrence Wilson v. Janis Peterson, et al
as 15-3896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE E. WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JANIS PETERSON, JAMES POMPUTIUS and CARYN TAYLOR
Lee v. City of Jackson Police Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv01199
Plaintiff:
Earl Jerome Lee, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Jackson Police Dept., The Jackson City Police Chief, The City & County of Madison Jackson, TN Mayors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Peterson et al
as 2:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Earl Wilson
Defendant:
Janis Peterson , James Pomputius and Caryn Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Arnold v. MI Dept of Human Services, et al
as 14-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PAUL ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Schoolcraft County, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Delta County, DELTA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Jason Arnold v. Timothy Greeley, et al
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PAUL ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY P. GREELEY, RICHARD E. ZAMBON and PAUL A. PETERSON
Peterson v. Burris et al
as 1:2014cv13000
Plaintiff:
Angel Peterson
Defendant:
Rocky Burris, Michigan State Industries and Millicent Warren
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
