Cases 1 - 10 of 33,390
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv01130
Defendant:
Raquel Miller and Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Jason Laron Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordle v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Cordle
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail Doctor, Sullivan County Jail, Sullivan County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Shelby County Sheriff Department
as 2:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Wallace
Defendant:
Officer (FNU) Buford and Shelby County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Medical-S.C.D.C.
as 2:2024cv02667
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lashay Vaughn
Defendant:
Medical-S.C.D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 2:2024cv02668
Defendant:
S.C.D.C.
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lashay Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croft v. South Central Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Joshua Croft
Defendant:
South Central Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreffler v. Tussey et al
as 5:2024cv00254
Defendant:
John Sturniolo, Sam Hensley and Terry Tussey
Plaintiff:
Mark Shreffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Burns
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jermeal G. White
Defendant:
D. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belt v. South Central Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Ashton Thomas, South Central Correctional Facility, Core Civic LLC of Tenn and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Belt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
