Cases 1 - 10 of 1,314
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Sullivan v. Benson
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Connie Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin, II v. Medina Township Police et al.
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Franklin, II, Vince and Vinny
Defendant:
Medina Township Police and Officer E. Chaperlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv10724
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel Evans, Robert M. Hayes, Robert Mendham and others
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Turner v. Pelky et al
as 2:2024cv10668
Plaintiff:
Lionel E. Turner, Jr
Defendant:
Pelky, Patrick Miseta, Jason Erway and others
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
