Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anthony Threatt v. Thomas Birkett, et al
as 14-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BIRKETT, Warden, S.M.F. BUSINESS OFFICE, MAHONEY, Hearing Investigator and others
Anthony Threatt v. Thomas Birkett, et al
as 14-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BIRKETT, Warden, S.M.F. BUSINESS OFFICE, MAHONEY, Hearing Investigator and others
Eads v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Eads
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Gayle Ray, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Threatt v. Thomas Birkett, et al
as 10-2189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BIRKETT, Warden, S.M.F. BUSINESS OFFICE, MAHONEY, Hearing Investigator and others
Russell v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2009cv02134
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Russell, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Mark J. Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Gibbs v. Tim Ball, et al
as 09-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY GIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BALL, THOMAS BIRKETT, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden and others
Darrell Davis v. MDOC, et al
as 08-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRIFFUS, Corrections Officer, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, MDOC and others
Gibbs et al v. Ball et al
as 2:2007cv15462
Plaintiff:
Stanley Gibbs and William Walker
Defendant:
Tim Ball, Thomas Birkett, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. MDOC et al
as 2:2007cv14791
Plaintiff:
Darrell Davis
Defendant:
MDOC, Griffus, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Threatt v. Birkett et al
as 2:2007cv11592
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt
Defendant:
Thomas Birkett, S. M. F. Business Office, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
