Cases 171 - 180 of 12,672
Smith v. Choi et al
as 2:2024cv11677
Defendant:
Amanda Dugan, John Doe, Kayla Stark-Matheny and others
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Triplett v. Avalos
as 2:2024cv02469
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Triplett
Defendant:
Officer Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett #200640 v. Hudson et al
as 1:2024cv00665
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Unknown Hudson
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt #602402 v. Hetrick et al
as 2:2024cv00107
Defendant:
Alicia Hetrick, Unknown McKinney and Unknown Lemmerman
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pratt #602402, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroh #255802 v. Tylutki et al
as 1:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Unknown Tylutki
Plaintiff:
Eugene Stroh #255802
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarrete #459086 v. Hariman et al
as 1:2024cv00660
Defendant:
Unknown Winger, E. Hariman and J. Kludy
Plaintiff:
Randal Alan Navarrete #459086
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plumb #761781 v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00664
Defendant:
Unknown Collier, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Unknown Bagley and others
Plaintiff:
Dewey Plumb #761781
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre France v. Richards
as 24-1549
Defendant:
UNKNOWN RICHARDS, Correctional Officer, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MAURICE FRANCE
Eugene Stroh v. Tom Tylutki, et al
as 24-1552
Defendant:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, MDOC-Warden, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of Department of Corrections, [UNKNOWN] PARKER, named as Inmate Parker "Baby Shaq", official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE LEE STROH
Beasley #615584 v. Watson
as 2:2024cv00106
Defendant:
Unknown Watson
Plaintiff:
Travontae E. Beasley #615584
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
