Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rivera #239567
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey #236321 v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00798
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bey #236321
Defendant:
Thomas Finco and Robert Mote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack-Bey #168807 v. Tribley et al
as 2:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Howard Jack-Bey #168807, Jr.
Defendant:
Linda Tribley, Daniel H. Heyns, Daphne M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muntaqim-Bey #130425 v. Hutchin
as 1:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ghalib Muntaqim-Bey #130425
Defendant:
Janet Hutchin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack-Bey #168807 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Howard Jack-Bey #168807, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey #236321 v. Napel et al
as 2:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bey #236321
Defendant:
Robert Napel, John Larson, Mike Laitinen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall #219552 et al v. Woods et al
as 2:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hall #219552, Ramon Jackson #290867 and Lonnie English-Bey #168605
Defendant:
Jeff Woods and Richard McKeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor #169904 v. Houston-Bey et al
as 2:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Taylor #169904, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Houston-Bey and Unknown Pillow
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bey #236321 v. Luetzow et al
as 2:2007cv00253
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bey #236321
Defendant:
William Luetzow, William Jondreau, R. Napel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey #236321 v. Luoma et al
as 2:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bey #236321
Defendant:
T. Luoma, Darlene Edlund, William Jondreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
