Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Day v. Chambers-Smith
as 4:2020cv01583
Plaintiff:
James A. Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith
Interested Party:
Interested Party State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Richland Correctional Inst. State of Ohio
as 1:2019cv01250
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Moon
Defendant:
Richland Correctional Inst. State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Richland Correctional Inst./State of Ohio
as 1:2019cv01068
Defendant:
Richland Correctional Inst./State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
James B. Kennedy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shephard v. Alinet et al
as 4:2019cv01051
Defendant:
Damons Hininger, Mona Parks, Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dean Shephard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. State Of Ohio et al
as 4:2019cv00557
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Lyneal Wainwright, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bismillah v. Bureau of Medical Services et al
as 3:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Bureau of Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Bismillah and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. John Doe et al
as 3:2018cv01213
Plaintiff:
Eddie Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe, Ottawa County Ohio and Port Clindton Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Mohr et al
as 4:2018cv00436
Plaintiff:
Deon S. Glenn
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr and Charmaine Bracy
Interested_party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Harris, Jr. v. OH, et al
as 16-4281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON HARRIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and CUYAHOGA COUNTY JAIL
Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehab and Correction, et al. et al
as 3:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Melody L Williams
Defendant:
Ohio Dept of Rehab and Corrections, Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution, Jenkins-Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
