Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson #417138 v. Sisco et al
as 1:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Deandre Cornell-Lee Grayson #417138
Defendant:
Angir Sisco, Lura Brown, Margaret Quellete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hall #600792 v. Cole et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Freddie Hall #600792
Defendant:
D. Cole, Peggy Erickson and Unknown Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Ross, F/N/U Steward, F/N/U Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick #606507 v. Cole et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick #606507
Defendant:
D. Cole and Unknown Van Acker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rijos-Mercado v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11157
Plaintiff:
Evlalio Rijos-Mercado
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington and Cole
Johnson v. Wieger et al
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Wieger, Cole Woodward, Rebekah Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole #232716 v. Smith
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Cole #232716
Defendant:
Unknown Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins #512603 v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Marquis D. Jenkins #512603
Defendant:
Dijon Jones, Austin Diekevers, Cole Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
