Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Courtney Smith
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department, Sheriff John Fuson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Batts et al
as 2:2018cv02818
Defendant:
F/N/U Jacobs, Ann Simon, Victoria Buzzanga and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duckett v. Parrish et al
as 1:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Duckett
Defendant:
Micheal Parris, Shane Adcock, Pettie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Henard et al
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Frost
Defendant:
Bill Henard, Officer Crosby, Cody Lumpkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bowen et al
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Edwin A Smith
Defendant:
J.C. Bowen, Robin Davenport, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Walton et al
as 2:2008cv02211
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walton, James Polk, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
