Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Harris v. Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Christian Harris
Defendant:
Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC doing business as Brewsters Cafe Bistro Pub, Scott B Rafuse and Colin Rafuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. Veeva Systems
as 2:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Ian Scott
Defendant:
Veeva Systems
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Scott v. Baptist Health Deaconess Madisonville, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tisha Scott
Defendant:
Baptist Health Deaconess Madisonville, Inc. doing business as Baptist Health Deaconess Madisonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Scott v. Tendon Manufacturing, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01404
Plaintiff:
Katrina Scott
Defendant:
Tendon Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Winkler v. Welch Sand & Gravel et al
as 1:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Shawn Winkler
Defendant:
Welch Sand & Gravel and Scott Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mahoney v. Aviva Metals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00626
Defendant:
Tim Messer, Aviva Metals, Inc., Scott Stamco and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Brickner v. Pro-Tec Coating Company Inc.
as 3:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
Scott Brickner
Defendant:
Pro-Tec Coating Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Haynes v. The Kroger Co.
as 2:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
M. Scott Haynes
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Webster v. Sontara Old Hickory, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00685
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Webster
Defendant:
Jacob Holm & Sonner Holding A/S, TWIG America, Inc., Sontara Old Hickory TN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Negulis v. Stahl/Scott Fetzer Company et al
as 5:2020cv01694
Defendant:
Stahl/Scott Fetzer Company, James Isaac, Amber Trost and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Negulis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
