Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Acuna et al v. Pipefitters Local No. 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund Plan et al
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACUNA, DANIEL ARMSTRONG, DOUGLAS BARDY and others
Defendant:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND PLAN, Carl Evans, CHRIS FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Armstrong v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Armstrong
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ridener v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ridener
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kelly v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 6:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Robbie Kelly
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coppess v. Healthways, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Coppess and Douglas J. Coppess
Defendant:
Healthways, Inc., Ben R. Leedle, Jr., Thomas G. Cigarran and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. v. Armstrong Mechanical Services, Inc., et al
as 3:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. and Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc.
Defendant:
Armstrong Mechanical Services, Inc. and Philip Cargnino
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. Cigna Group Insurance et al
as 3:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Sandra Armstrong
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
