Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Vertical Bridge 500, LLC v. Marshall County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Vertical Bridge 500, LLC
Defendant:
Marshall County, Tennessee and Marshall County Planning Commission, The
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
Porter et al v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2021cv12842
Plaintiff:
Tommy T. Porter and Sidney N. Langley
Defendant:
United States District Court, Special Operations Task Force, U.S. Probation and others
New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C. et al v. Marshall et al
as 5:2021cv00245
Petitioner:
New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C. doing business as Lexington Clinic East doing business as Lexington Clinic, P.S.C., Michael W. Eden, M.D. and Wayne A. Marlowe, M.D.
Respondent:
William Marshall and Barbara Marshall
Harris v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv11557
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
James M. Smith, Rhonda Longsworth, Eunice Jeffries and others
Cain v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv12483
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Marshall v. Debt Management Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01737
Defendant:
Debt Management Partners, LLC, John Doe Corporation d/b/a "Absolute" and National Debt Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
Ashley Marshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall v. Grand Blanc, Township of et al
as 5:2019cv10885
Defendant:
Ryhs, Susan J. Soderstrom, Ron Wiles and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Adkins et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Heaton, Teresa M. Weldon, Kara N. Lanham and others
Petitioner:
Theresa M. Donnelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Marshall v. George et al
as 2:2017cv12700
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Defendant:
Nick George, Joshua Warren, John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
