Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Fallis et al v. Jordan et al
as 3:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
David Fallis , Michael Pitzer , Daryl Lowery and others
Defendant:
Timothy Jordan , Louise Twining , Norman Rhoads and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michigan Urgent Care and Primary Care Physicians, PC v. Wang et al
as 2:2015cv10367
Plaintiff:
Michigan Urgent Care and Primary Care Physicians, PC
Defendant:
John Doe and Roger H. Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cody et al v. U.S. Servico, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10170
Plaintiff:
Johnny Cody , LeeAnne Snow , Alfred Sanders and others
Defendant:
U.S. Servico, Inc. and Brian Rogers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reed v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2014cv01701
Plaintiff:
Roger Reed
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Rogers v. IC SYSTEM, INC.
as 2:2014cv11681
Plaintiff:
Dana Rogers
Defendant:
IC SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P. v. Barack et al
as 2:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P.
Defendant:
Lana J. Barack and Roger Barack
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rogers v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stella Rogers
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Morgan & Pottinger, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris-Rogers v. Halsted Financial Services, LLC
as 2:2013cv02902
Plaintiff:
Trudy Harris-Rogers
Defendant:
Halsted Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Acker et al v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv15144
Petitioner:
Lawrence J Acker , Patrick Simasko , Wayne Stanford and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgewater et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv14709
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater, Bridgewater & Company Inc. and Specialty Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder, Jr., John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
