Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Granite Vision, Inc. v. BACA Systems LLC
as 5:2024cv10852
Plaintiff:
Granite Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
BACA Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Megha v. LCA-Vision Inc.
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
OD Anita Megha
Defendant:
LCA-Vision Inc. dba Lasik Plus and LCA-Vision Inc. doing business as Lasik Plus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HealthStar, LLC et al v. Dynamic Vision, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Axene Health Partners, LLC, Michael Gill, Dynamic Vision, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
HealthStar EVV, LLC and HealthStar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BullsEye Telecom, Inc. v. U.S. Vision, Inc.
as 2:2018cv12331
Defendant:
U.S. Vision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BullsEye Telecom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pro-Vision, Inc. v. Sanders
as 1:2014cv00519
Plaintiff:
Pro-Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
Norman Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmelzle v. Goddard et al
as 3:2014cv00843
Plaintiff:
Amy Schmelzle
Defendant:
Kailen Goddard , Lead Me Marketing Group, LLC , Just One Vision, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. plyam et al
as 1:2008cv00227
Defendant:
gregory plyam, Plyam of Chicago, Inc., Plyam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pearle Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. N.J. Eyes, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Pearle Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
N.J. Eyes, Inc. and Susan Bayles
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Cofi Enterprises of Panama City, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
Pearle Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
Cofi Enterprises of Panama City, Inc., Timothy F Finley, Joseph Comerford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Rupler Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00321
Plaintiff:
Pearle Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
Rupler Corp. and Jeffrey A Adler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
