Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peterson v. Decker et al
as 3:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Jessie James Decker and JJD Marks, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Noco Company v. Peterson et al
as 3:2018cv02708
Defendant:
Svetlana Matcenko and Javier Peterson
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bandit Industries, Inc. v. Peterson Pacific Corp.
as 2:2014cv13920
Defendant:
Peterson Pacific Corp., an Oregon corporation
Plaintiff:
Bandit Industries, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Ken Adamany, Rick Nielsen and others
Defendant:
Knoxville Wings, Inc, David L McFarland and Cullen Corbett
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. PTO, Inc
as 3:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Spirit One Music, Stephanie Nicks and others
Defendant:
PTO, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Hurley Mars Nicol, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv13872
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., ABKCO Music, Incorporated, Ken Adamany and others
Defendant:
Hurley Mars Nicol, Incorporated and Ronald Nicol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Sorpyk, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Emerald Forest Entertainment Company, Inc., Hori Productions America, Inc. doing business as Dinger and Ollie Music and others
Defendant:
Sorpyk, Inc. doing business as Club Bijou other Bootleggers and Kypros Diacou
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Newby's LLC et al
as 2:2007cv02355
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Harrick Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Newby's LLC and Todd Taylor Adams
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
