Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bruton v. Casteel et al
as 3:2013mc00131
Plaintiff:
Mell T. Bruton
Defendant:
Michelle Casteel and Lynn Nolan
Beastrom et al v. Carpenter Company et al
as 3:2011pf10010
Defendant:
FFP Holdings, LLC formerly doing business as Flexible Foam Products LLC formerly known as Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Carpenter Company, Crest Foam Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Beastrom, Seth Brown, Marjean Coddon and others
Not Yet Classified:
Ohio Decorative Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Beastrom et al v. Carpenter Company et al
as 1:2011pf10010
Plaintiff:
Greg Beastrom , Seth Brown , Marjean Coddon and others
Defendant:
Carpenter Company , Crest Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kimbro et al v. Toms et al
as 3:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
James V. Kimbro, Cathey P. Kimbro and Jeffrey G. Kimbro
Defendant:
Eric Toms , J. Smith , Alley Evola and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mafcote, Inc. et al v. Nolan Transportation Group, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mafcote, Inc. and Royal Consumer Products, LLC
Defendant:
Nolan Transportation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes et al v. Birds Eye Foods LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00541
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnes , Jacklyn Beagle , Diana Bennett and others
Defendant:
Birds Eye Foods LLC and Birds Eye Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dalmayer et al v Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2008cv12784
Plaintiff:
Bert Dalmayer, Sue Dalmayer, Sam Hughes and others
Defendant:
Presque Isle, County of , Onaway, City of , Terry Flewelling and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Nolan Kendrick
as 08-4267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOLAN C. KENDRICK
USA v. Nolan Kendrick
as 08-4269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOLAN C. KENDRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
