Cases 21 - 30 of 3,866
Williams v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv10632
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagne Generale Des Etablissements Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Wallace et al. v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft, et al
as 5:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
William Wallace, Matt Montross and Benjamin Roberts
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stewart et al v. Ladd et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jody Virginia Lynn Stewart, Delores Lee Robinette Reynolds and William Joseph Robinette, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard E. Ladd, Jr., Karissa H Range, Penn Stuart & Eskridge, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Thomas Weir, et al
as 24-5335
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS K. WEIR, WILLIAM L. DONALDSON and PAMELA SPIVEY
Tommy WilliamsIn re: Tommy Williams
as 24-1296
Petitioner:
In re: TOMMY LOUIS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
USA v. Samuel Nelson
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAMUEL WILLIAMS NELSON
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
USA v. Cortez Williams
as 24-3288
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CORTEZ K.D. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
