Cases 31 - 40 of 458
USA v. Peter Bolos
as 22-5552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER BOLOS
USA v. Peter Bolos
as 22-5486
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER BOLOS
Hunter Doster, et al v. Frank Kendall, et al
as 22-3497
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HUNTER DOSTER, JASON ANDERSON, MCKENNA COLANTANIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HON. FRANK KENDALL, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, In his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL MARSHALL B. WEBB, In his official capacity as Commander, Air Education and Training Command and others
Van Dyke Horn, LLC v. Van Dyke et al
as 4:2022cv11141
Plaintiff:
Van Dyke Horn, LLC
Defendant:
Peter Van Dyke, Michael Sherman, Jamie Kaye Walters and others
Clervrain et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv10743
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir, Biglauwick Plaisimond and others
Defendant:
Gary Peters, Debbie Stabenow, Andy Levin and others
USA v. Peter Bolos
as 22-5183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER BOLOS
USA v. Handsome Parker
as 22-1157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HANDSOME PETER PARKER
Doster et al v. Secretary of the Airforce et al
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Hunter Doster, Jason Anderson, McKenna Colantanio and others
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Marshall Webb and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Andrea Corvi, Jonathan Oberg and Johnathan Nipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Burton v. R.G. Peters Salt and Lumber Company et al
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Emma Burton
Defendant:
R.G. Peters Salt and Lumber Company and Richard G. Peters
Petitioner:
Fifth Third Bank
Interested Party:
Wheeler Upham, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
