Cases 31 - 40 of 3,869
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stewart et al v. Ladd et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jody Virginia Lynn Stewart, Delores Lee Robinette Reynolds and William Joseph Robinette, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard E. Ladd, Jr., Karissa H Range, Penn Stuart & Eskridge, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Thomas Weir, et al
as 24-5335
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS K. WEIR, WILLIAM L. DONALDSON and PAMELA SPIVEY
Tommy WilliamsIn re: Tommy Williams
as 24-1296
Petitioner:
In re: TOMMY LOUIS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
USA v. Samuel Nelson
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAMUEL WILLIAMS NELSON
USA v. Cortez Williams
as 24-3288
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CORTEZ K.D. WILLIAMS
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Petitioner:
American Resort Development Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
