Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
VanBlarcom v. Ash
as 3:2011mc00002
Plaintiff: Roger G. VanBlarcom
Defendant: Don Ash
Simpson v. RLB, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00548
Plaintiff: Debra Simpson
Defendant: RLB, Inc. and Blue Ash Educational Building, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
McCaughey v. City of Blue Ash, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv00732
Plaintiff: Dennis D McCaughey
Defendant: City of Blue Ash , John Doe 1-2 and Garlyn Shelton Inc
Claimant: EDS Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harn v. Ashe et al
as 3:2009mc00130
Plaintiff: Johnny Harn and Johnny Harn
Defendant: Terry Ashe, John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv14345
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Green v. Ash
as 3:2008mc00236
Petitioner: Monoleto Delshone Green
Respondent: (f/n/u) Ash
Blue Ash Service Center, Inc. v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv11387
Plaintiff: Blue Ash Service Center, Inc.
Defendant: Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Adamson et al v. Macatawa Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2007mc03001
Plaintiff: Steve Adamson, Steve Adamson, Steve Adamson and others
Defendant: Macatawa Bank Corporation, Macatawa Bank Corporation, Macatawa Bank Corporation and others
Tantus Tobacco, LLC et al v. Sudamax Industria E Commercio De Cigarros, LTDA et al
as 5:2007cv00003
Plaintiff: Tantus Tobacco, LLC, Tantus Tobacco, LLC, Butts & Ashes, LLC and others
Defendant: Sudamax Industria E Commercio De Cigarros, LTDA, Sudamax Industria E Commercio De Cigarros, LTDA, Sudamax Industria E Commercio De Cigarros, LTDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?