Cases 41 - 50 of 133
Herbert Smith v. Chae Harris, et al
as 19-3903
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERBERT A. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Moriarty et al v. Wynnestone Communities Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv12606
Defendant:
William C Bucher, Eric Van Lustbader, Douglas Allison Trust and others
Plaintiff:
LP Equity 3, LLC, Aubrey Family Trust, Daniel C Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daniel Hellmuth v. Leanne Hood, et al
as 19-3558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. HELLMUTH
Defendant / Appellee:
HERBERT HOOD and LEANNE HOOD
Edward Arnold v. Herbert Slatery, III
as 19-5509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD RONNY ARNOLD
Defendant / Appellee:
HERBERT H. SLATERY, III
Joshua Cline v. Mark Bolster, et al
as 19-5385
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA M. CLINE
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK J. BOLSTER, Acting Warden and HERBERT H. SLATERY, III
In re: Christopher Carbin
as 19-5376
Respondent:
HERBERT H. SLATERY, III and JESSE WILLIAMS, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER CARBIN
Vermaine Burns v. Kim Helper, et al
as 19-5055
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM R. HELPER, District Attorney for Williamson County, at Franklin, Tennessee, ROBERT L. HOLLOWAY, Judge, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, at Nashville, Tennessee, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERMAINE M. BURNS
State of Tennessee ex rel Slatery et al v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 3:2018cv00425
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Conoco, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and others
Plaintiff:
Shari Meghreblian, Herbert H Slatery and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Thomas et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Thomas and David Hixson
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, David W. Purkey and Herbert Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
