Cases 41 - 50 of 5,198
Zelesnik v. Powers et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Melissa Powers, Sheriff Unknown Prickett, Mike Brown and others
Bengel v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al.
as 5:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
John Bengal, Jack and John Bengel
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gabriel Kaimowitz v. Michigan Bar, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HILLEL KAIMOWITZ
Defendant:
MICHIGAN BAR, FLORIDA BAR, JOHN T. BERRY and others
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John BurtonIn re: John Burton
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN SAMUEL BURTON
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
In re: Melvin Davis, et al
as 24-101
Petitioner:
In re: MAGNA INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC., MAGNA INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MAGNA INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC. INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Not Yet Classified:
MELVIN DAVIS
Respondent:
SCOTT E. VOLLMAR, CORY L. HARRIS and BOBBY R. GARRETT, III
Florida Handling Systems, Inc. et al. v. Sinagoga
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Florida Handling Systems, Inc., Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc. and Mazzella Holding Company, Inc.
Defendant:
John Sinagoga
Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DJB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Alexander, Jr.In re: John Alexander, Jr.
as 24-1093
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ALLEN ALEXANDER, JR.
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Jones v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv10291
Plaintiff:
RoShieka Charisma Jones
Defendant:
LaTonya Ann Jones and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
