Cases 41 - 50 of 203
Phil Mills v. Harold May
as 21-3451
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHIL D. MILS and PHIL D. MILLS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD MAY, Warden
L.M. v. Henry County, KY Bd of Ed, et al
as 21-5217
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Department of Education, Division of Exceptional Children Services and DEBBIE MAYS, Director of the Division of Exceptional Children Services Office of Teaching and Learning, Division of Learning Services
Cross Appellant:
HENRY COUNTY, KY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.M., by and through her parents and next friends, M.M. and M.M.
Appellee:
GRETTA HYLTON, in her Official Capacity as Director, Kentucky Department of Education, Division of Learning Services
L.M. v. Henry County, KY Bd of Ed, et al
as 21-5196
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Department of Education, Division of Exceptional Children Services, HENRY COUNTY, KY BOARD OF EDUCATION and DEBBIE MAYS, Director of the Division of Exceptional Children Services Office of Teaching and Learning, Division of Learning Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.M., by and through her parents and next friends, M.M. and M.M.
Jeffrey King v. Tony Mays
as 21-5110
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY KING
Respondent / Appellee:
TONY MAYS, Warden
Faye Hobson, et al v. Mark Esper
as 21-5093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAYE RENNELL HOBSON
Plaintiff:
GLADYS BLOUNT, DESMA BLOUNT, JOYCE DIGGS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
In re: Jeremy Quinn, Jr.
as 21-3030
Respondent:
HAROLD MAY, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: JEREMY J. QUINN, JR.
Lampton v. Elite Health Institute LTD
as 2:2020cv06564
Defendant:
ELITE HEALTH INSTITUTE LTD dba ELITE BODY AND LASER CENTER
Plaintiff:
Lorraine May Lampton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Sean Steele v. Nicholas Neff, et al
as 20-4296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN M. STEELE
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. DOUG BYRD, LT. NICHOLAS NEFF, BRANDI GLORE, Case Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
