Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Downs v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2008mc00241
Plaintiff: Stephen Anthony Downs, Sr.
Defendant: Secretary of Veteran Affairs, Veteran Benefits Administration, Office of Personnel Management and others
United States of America v. Clyde Scott
as 08-4186
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLYDE D. SCOTT
United States of America v. Clyde Scott
as 08-4150
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLYDE D. SCOTT
Eric Ball v. John Holmes
as 08-2179
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIC CLYDE BALL
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN R. HOLMES
Ball #206600 v. Holmes
as 1:2007cv01095
Plaintiff: Eric Clyde Ball #206600
Defendant: John R. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Strawther v. Weaver et al
as 1:2007mc00019
Plaintiff: Joe E. Strawther
Defendant: Clyde Weaver, Sean Brantley and Cherry Lindamood
USA v. Cook We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-5860
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLYDE SANDER COOK
Bowling et al v. Haas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00032
Plaintiff: Thomas Clyde Bowling, Thomas Clyde Bowling, Ralph Baze and others
Defendant: Scott Haas, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bowling et al v. Haas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00007
Plaintiff: Thomas Clyde Bowling, Thomas Clyde Bowling, Ralph Baze and others
Defendant: Scott Haas, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2001cv07273
Plaintiff: Richard Miller and Clyde Minks
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Donald Bagley, Craig Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?