Cases 61 - 70 of 228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv10829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Edward Rios
as 20-1259
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD PEREZ RIOS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fredy Perez-Mota v. William Barr
as 20-3110
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
FREDY PEREZ-MOTA
Luther Johnson v. Lisa Peterson, et al
as 20-3101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUTHER JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR OSCAR CATALDI, Lead Doctor at Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution in his individual capacities, CARLOS PEREZ, Lead Doctor at Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution in his individual capacities, LISA PETERSON, Head Care Administrator at Allen Oakwood Institution in her individual capacities and others
Miguel Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, et al
as 20-1076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA PEREZ, by his Next Friend, Miguel Luna Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
STURGIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and STURGIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
USA v. Noe Flores-Perez
as 20-1077
Defendant / Appellant:
NOE FLORES-PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Malone v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Jennifer Perez, Internal Revenue Service, Christine L. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Edward Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. Jose Perez
as 19-6244
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ISABEL ALVAREZ PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nessel v. Price et al
as 2:2019cv13078
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Huggy Lamar Price, Virgil Perez and Brandie Taylor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
