Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, DAWN N. ISON, DIANE NICOLE PRINC and others
McKamey v. Skrmetti et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Russ McKamey
Defendant:
Jonathan Skrmetti and Carter Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giles v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv10138
Plaintiff:
Kevin La'von Giles
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dawn Ison, Diane N. Princ and others
USA v. Richard Carter
as 24-5001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD LOMAX CARTER
Farrell et al v. Hillsdale College Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Mason Farrell, Tanisha Carter, William Greenberg and others
Defendant:
Hillsdale College Inc., Pop Acta Media LLC, O2M Digital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Dixon v. Carter
as 2:2023cv12767
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr. and Stoic
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-z Carter, Shawn Carter and Jay-Z
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. Tom Drexler Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tom Drexler Plumbing, Inc., Tom Drexler Plumbing LLC, Diane Snedden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jordan v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Jordan and Tracy D. Halsell
Defendant:
Shawn Jay Z Carter, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Parkwood Entertainment LLC and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Lawon Carter
as 23-1680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWON CARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
