Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nestle Purina Petcare Company, et al v. Agri Stats, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv01324
Plaintiff:
Nestle Purina Petcare Company, Nestle USA Inc. and Nestle USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lori Mertins v. City of Mount Clemens, MI, et al
as 19-1416
Defendant / Appellee:
MARILYN DLUGE, individually and in her official capacity, STEVEN M. BROWN, individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF MOUNT CLEMENS, MICHIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI MERTINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hatcher v. Clemens et al
as 2:2017mc00003
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
Clemens, Ramsey, Mkamey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hatcher v. McKamey et al
as 2:2015mc00007
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
McKamey, Wayne Anderson, Gregg Simcox and others
USA v. John Marcinkewciz, II
as 12-2441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CLEMENS MARCINKEWCIZ, II
United States of America et al v. Mount Clemens Regional Medical Center et al
as 2:2011cv12844
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Robert Koss
Defendant:
Mount Clemens Regional Medical Center, Daniel Cozadd, Richard Reidy and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In re: Clemen Tarpley
as 10-8048
Debtor:
In re: CLEMEN DALE TARPLEY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CLEMEN DALE TARPLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
