Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act
Burns et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Michele Burns and Joseph Kruszynski
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ally Financial, Inc, et al v. Provident Funding Associates, LP et al
as 2:2017mc50414
Movant:
Ally Financial, Incorporated and Timothy Devine
Respondent:
Provident Funding Associates, LP, Standard Pacific Mortgage, Incorporated, Freedom Mortgage Corporation and others
Dwight Respess v. Ross Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 10-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT RESPESS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSS MORTGAGE CORPORATION and FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, fka Irwin Mortgage Corporation
Respess v. Ross Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv13127
Plaintiff:
Dwight Respess
Defendant:
Ross Mortgage Corporation and Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
