Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sean Houston, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE KRISTINI DAVENPORT TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JANET YELLEN, US Department of Treasury, DEBORAH HAALAND, US Department of Interior and others
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
RJ Control Consultants, Inc., et al v. Multiject, LLC, et al
as 20-1009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. ROGERS and RJ CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK ELDER, MULTIJECT, LLC, RSW TECHOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Roosen Varchetti Olivier
as 16-104
Petitioner:
In re: LYNN M. OLIVIER, RICHARD G. ROOSEN, ROOSEN, VARCHETTI & OLIVIER and others
Respondent:
PETER ANDA, JONATHAN ELSENBROEK, JACQUELYN JOHNSON and others
Geohegan v. Secretary of the Army
as 3:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Geohegan
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zuffa, LLC v. Holtsberry et al
as 3:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Mathew Holtsberry, Paul E Ward and Madalex Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
