Cases 101 - 110 of 488
Herrick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2014cv12082
Plaintiff:
Samantha Herrick
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VanPortfliet v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Paul Jay VanPortfliet
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrea Brichant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-5343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREA BRICHANT
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a citizen of California, WILSON & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C., SHELLIE WALLACE and others
Tibble v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2014cv00314
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Cathleen S. Tibble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Matthews et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2014cv11232
Plaintiff:
Teresa Matthews and Michael J. Matthews
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wiley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Byron Wiley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ryan et al v. Romo et al
as 2:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
James M. Ryan and Carolyn P. Ryan
Defendant:
Pedro Romo , Wells Fargo Bank NA , Shaun Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Bill Chapman, Jr., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, et al
as 13-6562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL CHAPMAN, JR. and LISA CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, WILSON & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. and others
Love v. Lew et al
as 2:2013cv14946
Plaintiff:
Daemon Love
Defendant:
Jack Lew, Shaun Donovan and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zua v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv02927
Plaintiff:
Anyiemah S Zua
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , MERS, Inc. , Wells Fargo Bank and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
