Cases 41 - 50 of 98
USA v. Quail Hollow Apartments, Ltd. et al
as 7:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Quail Hollow Apartments, Ltd., The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., County of Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv10107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP v. 3.2 ACRES PERMANENT EASEMENT, AND 4.2 ACRES TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF LAND IN COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO et al
as 2:2014cv02650
Defendant:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD, Linda K. Kessler Living Trust, Tri-Star Energy Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America v. Martin et al
as 0:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karen Lynn Martin and Charles Clifford Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martini et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv13169
Plaintiff:
Martin Martini and Mare Martini
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M & T Bank v. Martin
as 2:2014cv02566
Defendant:
Charley Mae Martin
Plaintiff:
M & T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lippert et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Lippert and Amber N Martin
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Finnerty et al v. MidFirst Bank, VRM
as 2:2014cv12316
Plaintiff:
Martin Finnerty and Tracy Finnerty
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank, VRM
United States of America v. Payne et al
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mary Kay Payne and Jeremy Martin Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martin v. M and T Bank et al
as 2:2014cv02145
Plaintiff:
Charley Mae Martin
Defendant:
M and T Bank , Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
