Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Terzneh v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2021cv02228
Defendant:
Jacob Tigert and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Messeret Terzneh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Amirul El v. Sabree et al
as 2:2020cv10153
Defendant:
Donald Coleman, Jacob S. Ghannam, Aaron D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Amirul El
Pritchard et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2019cv02777
Defendant:
Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC, United States Enrichment Corporation, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Pritchard and Sharon Melick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGlone et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2019cv02196
Defendant:
Mid-America Conversion Services, Fluor-BWXT Portsmouth, LLC, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
K. D., Julia Dunham, Ursula McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ploughman et al
as 5:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jacob Ploughman and Shannon Ploughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nottke et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2017cv00544
Plaintiff:
Michael Nottke and Norman Jacobs
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobs et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 3:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jacobs and Ronald Jacobs
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Homeward Residential Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braman v. DB Industries, Inc. d/b/a Capital Safety USA
as 2:2016cv13897
Defendant:
DB Industries, Inc. d/b/a Capital Safety USA
Plaintiff:
Jacob Braman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cato -v- Bryant
as 2:2016cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn S. Cato
Defendant:
Jacob Bryant and Joseph Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cato -v- Bryant
as 1:2016cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn S. Cato
Defendant:
Jacob Bryant and Joseph Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
