Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Peffly v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05700
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peffly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03087
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murriel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01662
Plaintiff:
Clyde S Murriel
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04600
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lafferty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02903
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lafferty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Torrent Private Limited, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackey et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02111
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Evelyn Mackey and Clyde Mackey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Modern Holdings, LLC, et al v Corning Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Caldwell, Clyde Simpson, Steven Coffman and others
Defendant:
City of Danville Kentucky, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cameron et al v. C. R. Bard et al
as 2:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cameron and Clyde Cameron
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
