Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Gross v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 2:2018cv12859
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gross v. The Andersons, Inc. dba Oakley Grain Elevator
as 1:2017cv13853
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gross
Defendant:
The Andersons, Inc. dba Oakley Grain Elevator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gross et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 5:2017cv01200
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gross and Ann Gross
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca LP, Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gross
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
v. Gross et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Defendant:
Jimmy Gross and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Edison v. Jackson, City of et al
as 2:2013cv12696
Plaintiff:
David William Edison
Defendant:
Jackson, City of , Matthew Heins , Paul Gross and others
United States of America et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen and others
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's Hopital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Gross v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22813
Plaintiff:
Paul Gross
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21885
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gross
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
