Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Grimm v. Raw Story Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Grimm
Defendant:
Raw Story Media, Inc., The Herald Publishing Company, LLC, MLive Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockhart v. Kurt et al
as 5:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lockhart
Defendant:
Sandra Kurt, Paul Gallagher, Kandi O Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Murphy v. Duclos et al
as 5:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Matt Murphy
Defendant:
Renald Duclos and Highland Transportation Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
Matt Douglas Wilson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wynia v. Letter
as 2:2014cv02576
Plaintiff:
Russell Wynia
Defendant:
Matt Letter
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hamdan v. Finston
as 2:2014cv12949
Plaintiff:
Randy A Hamdan
Defendant:
Matt Finston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennybacker v. Arbogast Used Car Depot, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Whitney Pennybacker
Defendant:
Arbogast Used Car Depot, Inc. , Car Credit Depot , Action Towing & Repair, Inc. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Douglas Pennybacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bozarth et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2013dp21572
Plaintiff:
Willie Ann Bozarth and Jerry Bozarth
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Cole Orthopaedics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al.
as 1:2012dp23679
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Howard
Defendant:
Justin Jones, DePuy Orthopedics Inc, Melissa Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McComb v. Aegis Security Insur. Co. et al
as 3:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
Robert S. McComb
Defendant:
Aegis Security Insur. Co., Anthony Buglio and Matt Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
