Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Gonyer et al v. Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2013cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gonyer and Susan Gonyer
Defendant:
Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, Enbridge Pipelines (Lakehead), L.L.C. and Enbridge Pipelines (Wisconsin), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Lewis v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.
as 13-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., dba Cn
McKerchie v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 2:2012cv15001
Plaintiff:
Eric McKerchie
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Hageman v. Wisconsin, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00389
Defendant:
River Valley Bank , Wisconsin, State of , Roger M. Ervin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hageman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Milton Simpson v. Betty Cothran, et al
as 12-6181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON LEON SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTY COTHRAN, WILLIAM COTHRAN, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and others
Simpson v. Cothran et al
as 2:2012cv02364
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
Betty Cothran, William Cothran, United Services Automobile Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 2:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Lewis
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harrison v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company et al
as 1:2011cv01238
Plaintiff:
Bruce Harrison
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Limited and Sault Ste. Marie Bridge Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harrison v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company et al
as 2:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Bruce Harrison
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Limited and Sault Ste. Marie Bridge Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Monson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2011dp22684
Plaintiff:
Roberta Monson
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , DePuy International Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
