Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Logsdon v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Logsdon
Defendant:
Daniel White , Graham Rutherford and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. Jackson et al
as 3:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
Donna Frazier
Defendant:
Sidney Jackson, Kevin Graham, Jackson, Foster & Richardson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peters v. Hagedorn et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Peters
Defendant:
Timothy Austin Hagedorn, Gregory Neil, Debbie Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
Graham et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21613
Plaintiff:
Gordon W. Graham and Patricia A. Graham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Joan S. Graham and Thomas C. Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. and Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 3:2012cv01160
Plaintiff:
Virginia C. Graham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21105
Plaintiff:
Virginia C. Graham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDLES v. Clay et al
as 2:2012cv12117
Plaintiff:
John Eric SANDLES
Defendant:
Eric L. Clay , John M. Rodger , James L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kubala et al v. Parker et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Susan Kubala
Defendant:
Travis Parker, Trent Parker, Michael Zerhusen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
