Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hatcher v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
as 3:2021cv00419
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Julie Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatcher v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04411
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mark Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marchbanks et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10322
Plaintiff:
Mary P. Alexander, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Leo A. Daly Company, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00657
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Amy Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatcher et al v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Richard Hatcher and Ohio Bureau of Worker's Compensation
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatcher v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017dp20002
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Elaine Hatcher
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Detroit, City of et al v. Hatcher
as 2:2015cv14307
Plaintiff:
Detroit, City of and Detroit Police Department
Defendant:
Eric D. Hatcher
Cope v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Eli Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Wanda Joyce Hatcher Wilson Feck and Trevor A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatcher v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatcher
Defendant:
Eddie Walter Smith and Maverick Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatcher v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv14277
Plaintiff:
Linda Hatcher
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
