Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hager et al v. Beshear et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Hager, Angela Merideth, Patricia Merideth and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew Graham Beshear, Eric C. Friedlander, U of L Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hite v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05456
Plaintiff:
Donald Hite
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hite v. Griffin et al
as 3:2020cv00720
Defendant:
Skyline EMS, LLC, Heather Green and Heather Griffin
Plaintiff:
Michael Hite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hite v. JKM Training, Inc.
as 7:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hite
Defendant:
JKM Training, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hite et al v. Target Corporation
as 4:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Irene Hite and Robert Hite
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hite v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
Charles Stephen Hite
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Hite et al
as 2:2015cv10161
Plaintiff:
Anita Ann Davis and Jacquelin Ann Hicks
Defendant:
Douglas Hite , Robert Farmer , Mike Wolosuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael R. Anglin et al v. Arbon Equipment Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Defendant:
Arbon Equipment Corporation and Rite-Hite Holding Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael R Anglin and Ashley Anglin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hite v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22751
Plaintiff:
Richard Hite
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Rite Hite International Dock & Door Safety Systems, et al
as 3:2009cv02507
Plaintiff:
Tracy Murphy
Defendant:
Rite Hite International Dock & Door Safety Systems, Rite Hite Corporation, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
