Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Arguijo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Hope Arguijo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coffman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
HOPE L. COFFMAN
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunn et al v. Hope Center Ministries et al
as 3:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Melissa Dunn, Bryan Dunn and Estate of Tyler Dunn
Defendant:
Hope Center Ministries, Joseph Reinhard Janson, Julie Yvonne Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hope-Fletcher v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00182
Defendant:
David L. Byrd and Harris Distributing Co.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hope-Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dean v. City of Gallatin et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
James E. Dean
Defendant:
City of Gallatin, Sumner County District Attorney's Office, WKRN News Channel 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Hope Network
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Anderson
Defendant:
Hope Network
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Price v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05653
Plaintiff:
Hope Price
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05662
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
HOPE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGlaughlin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00352
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hope McGlaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Doak et al
as 5:2019cv02653
Defendant:
Ted St. John, Sheriff David Doak, Hope Village and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
